[teqc] teqc +qc "invalid LLI" error
lou at unavco.org
Fri Apr 1 13:35:56 MST 2005
> I'm getting the following error when I run rinex files for PBO site p699
> through teqc's qc lite:
> teqc +qc -st 2005-03-31000000 +dh 24 p6990900.05o
> qc lite>
> teqc: teqc windowed: delta = 86400.000 secfailure to read
> "-2147467405.66148 12657.39" on line 56 of "p6990900.05o"
> (invalid LLI (Loss of Lock Indicator): should be 0-7) ... exiting
> The error only occurs if I include the -st and +dh arguments. Can you
> suggest a workaround? The -st and +dh arguments are used in SCOUT
> (http://sopac.ucsd.edu/cgi-bin/SCOUT.cgi) when qc'ing a file prior to
> running it through gamit.
> FYI, the file is available from the SOPAC archive at:
> http://garner.ucsd.edu/pub/rinex/2005/090/p6990900.05d.Z; teqc version
> version: teqc 2002Mar14
> build: Linux 2.0.36|Pentium II|gcc|Linux|486/DX+
Well, there are a lot of mysteries here. I downloaded the above
Hatanaka-compressed file and decompressed it with crx2rnx ver.u.2.3beta.
In doing so, line 56 doesn't contain the above line fragment, and,
in fact, it occurs nowhere in the whole .05o file. Running your command
using the current development version of teqc (although on Solaris Sparc)
produces normal results, but then again the phase values "fit" within the F14.3
formatting; the phase value you reported "-2147467405.661" is F15.3 -- i.e.
_not_ valid RINEX. This looks like the phase-overflow that we were initially
seeing in NetRS data. This overflow has been corrected in NetRS firmware --
though I don't if site p699 has the right rev of firmware for this or not --
but it doesn't matter because the data was translated with version 2005Jan28
of teqc which corrects the phase overflow even it's not corrected in the firmware.
Maybe the version of crx2rnx that you are using is bad. What version of
that are you using?
More information about the teqc