[teqc] Re: about "missed obs" on TEQC report

Francisco Javier Simón del Monte fjsimon at gmv.com
Wed Jul 21 01:46:28 MDT 2010

Dear Lou,

Thanks for your answer that is perfectly understood.


Francisco Javier Simón del Monte
Ingeniero de Telecomunicación
Unidad de Negocio GNSS
M. Sc. Telecommunications Engineering
GNSS Business Unit

Isaac Newton, 11
P.T.M. Tres Cantos
E-28760 Madrid
Tel. +34 91 807 76 91
Fax +34 91 807 21 99

-----Mensaje original-----
De: teqc-bounces at ls.unavco.org [mailto:teqc-bounces at ls.unavco.org] En nombre de teqc-request at ls.unavco.org
Enviado el: viernes, 16 de julio de 2010 20:00
Para: teqc at ls.unavco.org
Asunto: teqc Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3

Send teqc mailing list submissions to
	teqc at ls.unavco.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	teqc-request at ls.unavco.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	teqc-owner at ls.unavco.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of teqc digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: about "missed obs" on TEQC report (Lou Estey)


Message: 1
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:42:35 -0600
From: Lou Estey <lou at unavco.org>
Subject: Re: [teqc] about "missed obs" on TEQC report
To: teqc <teqc at ls.unavco.org>
Message-ID: <4C4061CB.8070307 at unavco.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed


I received a few comments that users felt that "missed obs" was a confusing
label.  Fair enough.  When this was added a year+ ago, I was focusing on new
functionality that seemed useful (and otherwise not available) and not the
labeling.  But to improve labeling, it would certainly be better to refer to
these as something like "masked obs" and reverse the angle condition in the
message, e.g. the tidb qc that Sim?n was showing would then be:

Possible obs >  10.0 deg:  20244
Complete obs >  10.0 deg:  14473
  Deleted obs >  10.0 deg:    347
   Masked obs <  10.0 deg:   5072

That's a bit clearer.  I'll make this change, unless anyone has a better


On 7/15/2010 10:41 AM, Lou Estey wrote:
> Dear Sim?n,
>> I would like to know how the field ?Missed obs? in the TEQC+qc report is
>> computed. In the attached TEQC+qc report it does not happen that:
>> Possible obs = complete obs + missed obs + deleted obs
>> as one would probably expect. I have been able to understand how the
>> fields ?Possible obs?, ?complete obs? and ?deleted obs? from the TEQC-qc
>> report are computed, but this is not the case for ?missed obs?. Could
>> you please tell me how is ?Missed obs? exactly computed?
> No, "missed obs" is not that at all. I will admit that the current
> labeling in the qc summary is pretty confusing, as in your attached
> file shows:
> Possible obs > 10.0 deg: 20244
> Complete obs > 10.0 deg: 14473
> Missed obs > 10.0 deg: 5072
> Deleted obs > 10.0 deg: 347
> "Missed obs" as added in 7 Mar 2009 (see
> http://facility.unavco.org/software/teqc/log.html ) and is
> related to the discrepancy lines '-dn' and '+dn':
> -dn| ++++++++ + ++ 11211 + ++++++ ++++ +122243433444444465556765588888 |-dn
> +dn| 1 51 3 525713412 4 5 2 1 21411123344444445554468688777688888881|+dn
> See all those '+' values on the '-dn' line? That's telling you that
> there is good data below 10 degrees (which is the default value for
> the cutoff mask for the qc). The "missed obs" count is the actual
> number of obs below the cutoff mask, i.e. you've "missed" using them
> in the qc if you keep the cutoff mask as is. If you lower the mask value
> (using the '-set_mask #' option), then the '+'s on the '-dn' line
> should become reduced in number and as should the "missed obs" count.
> What you where thinking of is ... "totally absent obs"?
> absent obs = possible obs - complete obs - deleted obs
> You can compute this yourself using the values provided, where
> this is, like the rest, dependent on the cutoff mask angle.
> cheers,
> --lou
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Louis H. Estey, Ph.D. office: [+001] 303-381-7456
> UNAVCO, 6350 Nautilus Drive FAX: [+001] 303-381-7451
> Boulder, CO 80301-5554 e-mail: lou unavco.org
> WWW: http://www.unavco.org http://jules.unavco.org
> "If the universe is the answer, what is the question?"
> -- Leon Lederman
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


teqc mailing list
teqc at ls.unavco.org

End of teqc Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3

This message including any attachments may contain confidential 
information, according to our Information Security Management System,
 and intended solely for a specific individual to whom they are addressed.
 Any unauthorised copy, disclosure or distribution of this message
 is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in error,
 please notify the sender immediately and delete it.

Este mensaje, y en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al mismo,
 puede contener informacion clasificada por su emisor como confidencial
 en el marco de su Sistema de Gestion de Seguridad de la 
Informacion siendo para uso exclusivo del destinatario, quedando 
prohibida su divulgacion copia o distribucion a terceros sin la 
autorizacion expresa del remitente. Si Vd. ha recibido este mensaje 
 erroneamente, se ruega lo notifique al remitente y proceda a su borrado. 
Gracias por su colaboracion.


More information about the teqc mailing list