[teqc] Trimble RTX and teqc
Lou Estey
lou at unavco.org
Thu Feb 22 12:39:16 MST 2018
hi John,
(Note for the teqc list: John sent me a sample .t02 file from his Trimble R10,
on which the following is based.)
It appears that all you have to do, for this case of a .tgd converted from a
.t02 from an R10, is include the teqc option '+CA_L1' during translation.
E.g. if you include '+CA_L1' for the SV/observation summary run:
[1156] teqc +quiet +CA_L1 -G +all -O.sum . 42400512.tgd
L1 L2 C1 C2 P2 S1 S2
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
R04 240 240 240 240 240 240 240
R14 240 240 240 240 240 240 240
R13 240 240 240 240 240 240 240
R12 170 0 170 0 0 170 0
R03 240 240 240 240 240 240 240
R02 240 240 240 240 240 240 240
R15 82 82 82 82 82 82 82
... then you see that the RINEX L1 (and S1) are now populated for GLONASS.
Here at UNAVCO are vastly more familiar with the Trimble NetR9, and teqc has been
tuned to get the RINEX L1, S1, and D1 (the latter if you wanted L1 doppler as well)
for GLONASS to be from the observables of the GLONASS G1HA ("high-accuracy") signal
(analogous to the GPS L1P(Y) signal, except there's no encryption on G1HA).
However, based on your file, the Trimble R10 does not appear to track G1HA, and
instead tracks just the G1SA ("standard accuracy") signal (analogous to the GPS L1C/A
signal). Therefore, you have to instruct teqc to get the RINEX L1 (and S1 and D1) from
a different location.
Note for all: In general, I'd like find time to disambiguate selection of
GPS L1C/A observables from L1P(Y) observables using '+CA_L1' and '-CA_L1'
vs. the selection of GLONASS G1SA observables from G1HA observables using
a new set of options, say, '+SA_L1' and '-SA_L1'. This has been on my "to do"
list for quite a while, but these options don't yet exist.
cheers,
--lou
On 21-Feb-18 01:36 PM, Lou Estey wrote:
> Ok, what we've learned here is that the Trimble conversion is
> including GPS L2C data and excluding GPS L2P(Y) pseudorange data compared
> to the default teqc translation. (However, the Trimble translation
> must be including GPS L2P(Y) phase data because the RINEX L2 count
> is non-zero for the GPS SVs where the RINEX C2 count is zero.
> That's sort of odd ...)
>
> However, you say that the teqc-produced RINEX in the RTX processing
> is handling GPS ok, but not GLONASS. For GLONASS, the big difference
> is the lack of G1SA phase data in the teqc-produced RINEX. This is
> definitely not normal, but then again most of our GLONASS experience
> from Trimble receivers is from the NetR9, not an R10 like you are
> using.
>
> I guess this will take looking at the raw data file from R10, which
> you can email to me. (Any short file will suffice.)
>
> --lou
>
> On 2018 Feb 21, 12:34 PM, John Hamilton wrote:
>> So here is the output from the trimble conversion:
>> C1 C2 L1 L2 P2
>> ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
>> G01 240 240 240 240 240
>> G10 240 240 240 240 240
>> G12 232 232 232 232 232
>> G14 240 0 240 240 240
>> G22 240 0 240 240 240
>> G25 240 240 240 240 240
>> G31 240 240 240 240 240
>> G32 240 240 240 240 240
>> G26 170 170 170 170 170
>> G03 154 154 154 154 154
>> R02 240 240 240 240 240
>> R03 240 240 240 240 240
>> R04 240 240 240 240 240
>> R12 170 0 170 0 0
>> R13 240 240 240 240 240
>> R14 240 240 240 240 240
>> R15 82 82 82 82 82
>>
>> and the teqc conversion...
>> L1 L2 C1 P2 S1 S2
>> ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
>> G10 240 240 240 240 240 240
>> G32 240 240 240 240 240 240
>> G14 240 240 240 240 240 240
>> G31 240 240 240 240 240 240
>> G25 240 240 240 240 240 240
>> G22 240 240 240 240 240 240
>> G01 240 240 240 240 240 240
>> G12 232 232 232 232 232 232
>> G26 170 170 170 170 170 170
>> G03 154 154 154 154 154 154
>> R04 0 240 240 240 0 240
>> R14 0 240 240 240 0 240
>> R13 0 240 240 240 0 240
>> R12 0 0 170 0 0 0
>> R03 0 240 240 240 0 240
>> R02 0 240 240 240 0 240
>> R15 0 82 82 82 0 82
>>
>> I was not using any options, just teqc 42400510.tgd>42400510.18o. In the past I always used -tr d but discovered that was not necessary
More information about the teqc
mailing list