[teqc] teqc and "recent" rt27 format change

Mathieu Peyréga mathieu.peyrega at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 11:22:12 MDT 2018


Hello,

in order to close this thread, Trimble provided me with a sample in the 
very same configuration that the one setup on the station and teqc is 
100% ok with it.

I upgraded 4h ago and averything is fine since then.

Best regards,

Mathieu Peyréga
--
tel : +33 (0)6 87 30 83 59


Le 06/06/2018 à 19:35, Lou Estey a écrit :
> Observable measurements are in 0x57.  You can find out the total 
> number with:
>
> [765] teqc -notice +diag . +mds Sample_RT27_log 2>&1 | g "type= 0x57" 
> | wc -l
>   33332
>
> The total number of 0x55 records (all subtypes) can be found in a 
> similar way:
>
> [766] teqc -notice +diag . +mds Sample_RT27_log 2>&1 | g "type= 0x55" 
> | wc
>     167
>
> Now because this happens:
>
> [769] teqc -notice +all -O.sum . Sample_RT27_log
> 'Sample_RT27_log' appears to have no usable data
>
> it probably means that Trimble has also introduced a new 0x57 subtype 
> to hold
> observable measurements -- and I don't documentation for any of that.  
> For teqc
> users, this is much more significant issue than what ever they added 
> to 0x55 for
> position/velocity.
>
> --lou
>
> On 06-Jun-18 10:59 AM, Mathieu Peyréga wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> from the configuration settings that Trimble sent me, this file is 
>> supposed to contain measurements, but I have not been able to get 
>> them out with teqc and my usual command lines (it's ok for ephemerids)
>>
>> I saw there is a new tick box in the i/o page settings for "Include 
>> FLL measurements". Also the config is not the one I use on my 
>> production chain on other aspects. I've been asking them for a sample 
>> with same settings and will see after that... I hope they have not 
>> replaced the measurements record with this new 0x55-22 record....
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Mathieu Peyréga
>> -- 
>> +33 (0)6 87 30 83 59
>>
>> Le 06/06/2018 à 18:16, Lou Estey a écrit :
>>> dear Mathieu,
>>>
>>> With the sample Trimble RT27 file that you sent (and, btw, thanks 
>>> for that),
>>> nothing unexpected happens:
>>>
>>> [723] teqc +meta Sample_RT27_log
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> ! Notice ! Trimble BSTR 0x55-22 (unknown): no routine in teqc
>>> filename:                Sample_RT27_log
>>> file format:             Trimble BSTR
>>> file size (bytes):       3605918
>>> start date & time:       2018-06-06 10:05:31.000
>>> final date & time:       2018-06-06 10:21:58.000
>>> sample interval:         1.0000
>>> possible missing epochs: 0
>>> 4-char station code:     Samp
>>> station name:            -Unknown-
>>> station ID number:
>>> antenna ID number:       -Unknown-
>>> antenna type:            -Unknown-
>>> antenna latitude (deg):      47.298988807
>>> antenna longitude (deg):     -1.508875865
>>> antenna elevation (m):            79.1697
>>> antenna height (m):      0.0000
>>> receiver ID number:      -Unknown-
>>> receiver type:           TRIMBLE
>>> receiver firmware:       -Unknown-
>>>
>>> I'm assuming that record 0x55 subtype 22 is the new thing:
>>> > One of the changes states : Improve RT27 longitude velocity subtype
>>> ... but you still get out coordinates even with teqc not able to read
>>> this new 0x55-22.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> --lou
>>>
>>> On 05-Jun-18 01:43 PM, Mathieu Peyréga wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> no I have not tested it yet...
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer to make sure that teqc is ready to handle the change 
>>>> before doing the upgrade as the station is included in french CORS 
>>>> and I would prefer not needding to handle upgrade / teqc fail / 
>>>> downgrade event sequence
>>>>
>>>> Do you think you are able to ask Trimble some data sample under 
>>>> your NDA regarding RT27 format and check hw teqc behaves ?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mathieu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 05/06/2018 à 21:37, Lou Estey a écrit :
>>>>> Did you test it?  But given the wording in the release notes, it 
>>>>> sounds like Trimble
>>>>> has introduced something new in RT27 where code in teqc would have 
>>>>> to be changed in order
>>>>> to use it.
>>>>>
>>>>> --lou
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> Louis H. Estey, Ph.D.              office:  [+001] 303-381-7456
>>>>> UNAVCO, 6350 Nautilus Drive           FAX:  [+001] 303-381-7451
>>>>> Boulder, CO  80301-5554            e-mail:  lou unavco.org
>>>>>
>>>>> "If the universe is the answer, what is the question?"
>>>>>                                                -- Leon Lederman
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05-Jun-18 01:03 PM, Mathieu Peyréga wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i'd like to upgrade a Trimble BD970 board receiver that is 
>>>>>> currently in 5.21 version to the recently released 5.34
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://trl.trimble.com/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-881142/BD9XX_V5.3X%20Release%20Notes.pdf 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the changes states : Improve RT27 longitude velocity subtype.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As my Rinex production chain is based on teqc parsing the rt27 
>>>>>> datastream, I'd like to make sure that this change will not break 
>>>>>> things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did someone tested those new firmwares yet against teqc ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathieu Peyréga
>

-- 
tel : +33 (0)6 87 30 83 59



More information about the teqc mailing list